Welcome as a guest in the Astrodienst forum. You can login to your Astro profile or register as a forum member.You can also remain in the guest status and navigate through this forum as a reader. 22.07.2014 at 22:33 [UT+1]
 
 Forum Rules Home Help Search  
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Astro-Databank: Queen of England Elizabeth II (Read 1393 times)
Astro-Databank
Global Moderator
Astrodienst Staff
Adb editor
***




Posts: 204
Astro-Databank: Queen of England Elizabeth II
« on: 14.06.2002 at 13:30 [UT+1] »
 
Discussion about
Queen of England Elizabeth II, born 21 April 1926 at 02:40 AM in London
 
This discussion is imported from the  comment board on the  previous astrodatabank.com website.

Queen Elizabeth II is celebrating her 50th year on the British throne. She has been an exemplary monarch. She is the apotheosis of dignity, grace and reserve. Her children are not. It must be quite a burden on her that all four of her children have ended up in the midst of tabloid sex scandals. Equally dismaying is the shrinking of her empire. Forty former British colonies, protectorates and territories have been granted their independence during her reign. Ironically, as her dominion has decreased, her wealth has increased. Queen Elizabeth II has become one of the world's wealthiest women.
  • As the court astrologer could you judge this as the chart of a monarch with a shrinking empire? How do you account for the countervailing shift in her financial resources? Her dominion is much smaller, but her wealth much larger.  
  • What makes this the chart of an intensely private person?  
  • What a burden it must be for such a private person to see her kids written up in the scandal sheets. Can you find where "scandalous children" is written in her chart?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Adb web user
Ex Member




re: Queen of England Elizabeth II
« Reply #1 - on: 14.06.2002 at 13:30 [UT+1] »
 
reply by Astrodatabank Web User Marjorie Orr
 
Marjorie Orr : www.astroinform.com QUEEN ELIZABETH 11 The key planet which dominates Q Eliz 11's chart is the obsessively dutiful Saturn on the mid heaven squaring onto Mars & Jupiter in Aquarius and onto Moon & Neptune in Leo. She was brought up by a rigidly disciplinarian Mother (not the bundle of candy floss she looked) and a very strict Scottish nanny. Her mother was also fey (Moon Neptune), not emotionally accessible or supportive and the Queen's early upbringing left her with a hint of an obsessive compulsive disorder. Useful for a lifetime of tedious, repetitive social engagements, but her afflicted Moon was not helpful in creating a healthy maternal environment, especially for the two eldest children - Charles & Anne. She also has a water grand trine in her chart, making her very emotionally self protective - fixating on her dogs and horses as safer than fickle human beings.
 Perhaps a fixed Saturn on the point of a T square, especially in Scorpio, with its intense dislike of sharing, contributed to a shrinking of her empire. She hangs on too tight and cannot allow the bounty of the universe to expand her horizons. Though with Venus in Pisces in the 2nd she has a magical ability to attract personal wealth.
 Her children's failed marriages were undoubtedly due to an over formal, non-nurturing upbringing, which left them without sound emotional instincts, feeling more like pawns than people. Anne (Moon Saturn conjunction, Sun Pluto in the 10th) & Andrew (Moon Neptune conjunction in Scorpio, Sun Pluto opposition) were looking for love, not wisely but too well. Charles (Sun Pluto square, wide Moon Pluto square) had little choice when it came to marriage.  
 Everything the Queen does brings publicity - Mars Neptune opposition - but squaring in her chart as it does onto Saturn, brings in a sleazy influence. So much is repressed in the Queen's chart, with an impacted Saturn in Scorpio, that it has to live out by projection around her. Mrs Thatcher with a similarly strong Saturn in Scorpio had a political life riddled with sexual scandals in her Cabinet, but nothing that touched her.  
I often thought that Princess Diana - in her fragile psychological state - lived out all the unspoken & unlived turmoil, passion, anger, jealousy and resentment which in an over controlled Royal Family could never be expressed.  
 Uranus squares Saturn this year ( the final planet on the dominant T square) which is the end of a tumultuous few years for the Queen as disruption followed disruption, and both her Mother and sister were declining through this time. In another chart, their deaths might have been expected earlier, but with the Queen's tremendously fixed chart, she clearly could not let go until the final phase. It is interesting that it was her 'career' planet Saturn which was affected. She does not have the normal emotional responses you would expect with the death of close relatives, since everything is subsumed to duty. When her father died Pluto (at 20 Leo) was opposing Mars on the fixed T square. His death left little time for mourning, since she then had to embark on an onerous new career.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Adb web user
Ex Member




re: Queen of England Elizabeth II
« Reply #2 - on: 14.06.2002 at 13:30 [UT+1] »
 
reply by Astrodatabank Web User
 
The Queen and her children's sexual misdeeds: Gemini rules fifth house of children. Venus, Gemini's esoteric ruler in QE's first house of self in Pisces (dissillusionment) means she obviously chose these children and their problems as a major life lesson for herself. House six is the second house from the children's house, so it rules how they value things. It contains Pluto in Cancer (tearing down and rebuilding family structures according to their own values). The Queen has always stuck to her ideals as far as how a Royal should behave sexually (Mars and Jupiter in Aquarius, first house). But, Mars and Jupiter square Saturn in Scorpio on the MC (her ideals do not necessarily match the sexual ideals expressed by those people over which she has athority). She uses that self-control over over her sexual expression (Saturn in Scorpio) to effectively deal with the unpredictable, and dissillusioning situations that her children keep presenting her with (Saturn in Scorpio trine Uranus in Pisces, widely conjunct the children's ruler, Mercury).
Why her kingdom got smaller: QE's Pluto in Cancer (breaking down in the homeland) conjunct North node (something she came here to do) in the sixth house that rules servants and employees or charges. Uranus in the second house trine Saturn on the MC, both in water signs signifies an ability to rule wisely, understanding or empathising with, and valuing peoples' need for freedom.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Adb web user
Ex Member




re: Queen of England Elizabeth II
« Reply #3 - on: 14.06.2002 at 13:30 [UT+1] »
 
reply by Astrodatabank Web User Eleanor Buckwalter
 
Saturn, Asc. ruler, in the M.C. indicates a very public position of dignity and status (a monarch). It squares Jupiter (expansion) in her first house which indicates increasing personal wealth, but a shrinking (Saturn)dominion.
The Sun on the I.C. indicates a very private person.
"Scandalous children" are indicated by Mercury, ruler of the 5th house of children, being conjunct Uranus, planet of rebellion. The children are rash and independent (Merc. in Aries) as well as having a tendency to rebel against tradition (Uranus conj. Merc.)
Both mother and sister died this spring as the transiting Saturn/Pluto opposition made a T-Square to her Venus in Pisces, ruler of both the 3rd house of siblings and the 4th of mother. At the same time, Neptune was opposing the Moon in Leo (Queen Mother). I believed the Queen Mum died of pneumonia (a Neptunian disease).
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Adb web user
Ex Member




re: Queen of England Elizabeth II
« Reply #4 - on: 14.06.2002 at 13:30 [UT+1] »
 
reply by Astrodatabank Web User Bill Lindsay
 
1. <b>Shrinking Empire, Growing Wealth</b>...before I move on I would like to say that I don't use the house system used here for the Queen...though the ascendant is calculated the same way in almost every system(thus it would be at the same point in nearly every system), the system I use would have the house cusps at 21/23 of each sign, and as 21/23 of Capricorn is rising here, I would say that the Aquarius point is pretty close to rising and thus her first house comes under its sway, more than under Capricorn. This flows right into my response to this question. Having the point of Aquarius rising, she is the most modern of all monarchs and the most socially active, she has her ruling planet Uranus very close to Aries, with Mercury also there, both are trine to Saturn near Sagittarius in the 11th. She is dedicated to her social life and her people, she wants to travel and educate. It is not hard to see that she is an advocate of independence, at least on the surface. I would imagine quite a bit of her wealth is from social appearances and gifts from other wealthy monarchs and subjects(with Sun in Taurus in the 4th, she does like gifts). Don't forget that she married 'well'. 2. <b>Private person</b>...she has the Moon in the 8th (my system) so she probably cherishes her private creative time, where she can have things her way. Her Taurus Sun likes to stay centered, especially because he is in her 4th House, she needs time to steady herself amidst all this instability. 3. <b>Scandal Sheets</b>...I don't think it's a burden at all. The tendency to use propaganda to pull down a monarch and the royal family, to embarass or sensationalize, has been with us since the dawn of time. We are all familiar with the tales of Robin Hood and William Wallace(some would say they are the same person), where they each face a ruthless and greedy king. Tales of kings and queens who advocated rape and pillaging is little different from the scandals of today, and the British monarchy has always been rife with rumors of incest, adultery, addiction and other sins, true or not. The minstrels and messengers of the past are no different from the reporters of today, and no doubt many rumors about what the princes and princesses were hedonistically doing fell upon the ears of their royal parents. I am sure there have been similar rumors about the Queen when she was young. The plain truth is that when you've got people talking about you and your children in the media, you must be an effective and powerful monarch. I doubt the media exposure of her children and grandchildren phases her one bit. With a Taurus Sun, it won't change the price of her tea. Gemini is in power in her 5th House, so she probably enjoys the fact that her children are being talked about. People like to read about the young, glamourous, rich and opulent, good or bad. And sometimes a rumor, good or bad, can act as an advertisement, a subconscious message that the people being rumored are highly recommended and should be sought after for various purposes.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Adb web user
Ex Member




re: Queen of England Elizabeth II
« Reply #5 - on: 18.06.2002 at 13:30 [UT+1] »
 
reply by Astrodatabank Web User silvia p.
 
Wealth and colonies: I would attribute colonies and the interaction with them at the 6th house of servants. Finding Pluto in it suggests me that deep changes are required, with losses involved and something new to take place for it (wealth?). Land and possessions of it I would attribute to cancer, the 4th house, Saturn and Capricorn. So the picture gets quite clear here. Again Pluto in cancer - loss of land, Saturn in Scorpio kind of brings up this theme again which would be quite dominant for her due to her Capricorn Ascendant. Her second house also contains Chiron which could indicate loss and in this case on the financial level (how much would she have if Britain still had its colonies?). With Capricorn Ascendant, Sun in Taurus in the 2nd house on the cusp of the third she certainly appreciates wealth, status and material possessions. Mercury the lively ruler of her 8th house (money of third) is in her 2nd house of financial possessions making an interesting conjunction with Uranus which would make everything possible as well as unpredictable. Her strong Jupiter placement conjunct Mars in her first house could be seen as an indication of enhancement of personal values.
Privacy: Capricorn rising with the ruling planet being the symbol for privacy conjunct a scorpionic Midheaven would make her in my opinion very very private. Her south node in Capricorn conj. the ASC would enhance this attitude, indicating that it is an instinctive and safe way of reacting to the outer world.  
 Scandalous children: Attributing children to the 5th house, we find a Gemini cusp. The ruler Mercury is conjunct Uranus in the second. My conclusion is that her children would be let's say quite "lively" and probably unconventional but in my opinion not scandalous. Also Gemini would represent "gossip" so they would be gossiped about, no matter what they do. With Mercury conj. Uranus in this modern era, the gossip is broadcasted just to make things worse. But scandalous? No, not really.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Adb web user
Ex Member




re: Queen of England Elizabeth II
« Reply #6 - on: 18.06.2002 at 13:30 [UT+1] »
 
reply by Astrodatabank Web User Michael Bradford
 
In the Vedic / Sidereal system, Queen Elizabeth's chart clearly reflects both her shrinking empire and expanding wealth. QEs role as a monarch is indicated by the fact that the two planets associated with kingship, Sun and Mars, are both exalted, well-placed, and occupy, rule or aspect the 5th house of government ministership. However, a person's general position in life is shown by the condition and placement of the 1st lord, and power and authority are shown by the 10th house and lord. In this chart, both 1st lord Jupiter and 10th lord Mercury are in their constellation of debilitation, indicating substantial difficulty in both these areas. First lord Jupiter does get cancellation of debility (neecha bhanga) as a) Jupiter is aspected by dispositor Saturn, and b) Mars, who is exalted where Jupiter is debilitated, is in an angle from the Moon, but even though this may have contributed to her great fame and status, the debility (shrinking power) is still very much in evidence.
It may seem odd at first that a person of Queen Elizabeth's status and fame should have a debilitated 1st lord, but in fact, she has very little control over the circumstances of her life as most of her actions are dictated by duty (1st lord Jupiter in a rashi of Saturn, aspected by Saturn). The respect and general public approval she gets are indicated by the placement of her lagna (ascendant) in Uttara Ashada, a lunar mansion which connotes one who is respected and valued for their views and opinions (see Martin Luther King Jr.'s 10th house Sun, for example).  
Her great wealth is clearly shown by two powerful dhana (wealth) yogas. The primary of these is the association of 1st lord Jupiter and 5th lord Mars in the 2nd house of finance. The power of this yoga is very great as Jupiter is the 'yogi' (primary wealth giving planet) of the chart, and Mars is the 'duplicate yogi' (secondary wealth giving planet) of the chart. Secondly, Nars and Moon form Chandra-Mangala yoga which is very potent as Mars is exalted and Moon is swarashi (in her own constellation of Cancer). A third factor enhancing both these combinations is the placement of Mars and Jupiter in Dhanishtha, a lunar mansion associated with great wealth, gems and precious metals (i.e. crowns and jewel-studded carriages), and property (castles).
Her desire for privacy is indicated by the presence of Ketu (the south node of the Moon) in the 1st house and Rahu, the north node, in the 7th. The nodes are secretive by nature and they are the only influences on the 1st house.
The 5th house of children is occupied by an exalted Sun who is disposited by an exalted Mars sitting in the 2nd house of family, aspecting back into his own house, indicating children who are very prominent. The 8th house rules scandals and the aspect of 8th lord Moon from the 8th house on the 5th lord Mars would indicate difficulties in this area for her children. The Moon sits in the lunar mansion of Ashlesha, which is associated with secret sex, pain, and issues of personal power, all elements of the scandals that have plagued her children. The aspect of this Moon on 1st lord Jupiter indicates that these same scandals would have an impact on her as well as on her children.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Adb web user
Ex Member




re: Queen of England Elizabeth II
« Reply #7 - on: 22.06.2002 at 13:30 [UT+1] »
 
reply by Astrodatabank Web User Srecko Slavec
 
1) Saturn is in opposition with the 4. house (colonies)! Neptune (ruler of the 2.house) in trine with Sun (ruler of the 4.house) - profit from shrinking of the empire! Jupiter (co-ruler of the 2.house) helps gaining wealth! 2)Saturn (Asc ruler) speaks for himself! There are 7 planets below the horizont (Asc-Desc axe)! 3)Mercury in Aries in conjunction with Uranus in Pisces tells as a story of passionate but sometimes disoriented childrens!
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Adb web user
Ex Member




re: Queen of England Elizabeth II
« Reply #8 - on: 23.06.2002 at 13:30 [UT+1] »
 
reply by Astrodatabank Web User Southern Cross
 
Wallis Simpson must be laughing in her grave about the "royal sex scandals". I don´t follow this soap opera, and agree it is gossip-mongering by an aggressive press(Aries Mercury rules fifth of children). Chart ruler Saturn in Scorpio does relate to problems with sex, however, as well as an intense, private nature. The square to Neptune in the seventh of marriage gives stiff-upper-lip forgiveness for a serial philanderer spouse. The Queen now pays some income tax, but her wealth still comes more from the frugal administration of untaxed assets than any great business acumen. Astrological correspondences between important events in British history and Elizabeth´s chart are not limited to her fifty-year rule. Her conjoined eighth-house(inheritance) co-rulers are nearly unaspected, indicating the vulnerability of colonial land acquisitions(Taurus Sun) due to military weakness(Aries Chiron). In this regard, the shocking 1942 Singapore surrender(Aquarius Mars/Jupiter) and Burma retreat led to Indian independence and the delayed(Saturn square) dissolution(Neptune completes T-square) of empire as much or more than Gandhi. Prime Minister under both George VI and Elizabeth, Winston Churchill´s chart ruler was also Chiron in Aries. Lucky(Jupiter) enough to have vanquished(and Mars in) Hitler with Allied help(Libra), he prophetically(Neptune) protested their shared fate of presiding over the dissolution of the British Empire. His Neptune= her Chiron at 28*Aries, and her Saturn= George VI´s second-house Scorpio Moon.
 Quatrain V. 45(research and interpretation by John Milton Taber) Le grand Empire sera tost desole, The great Empire will be totally desolated, Et translaté pres d´Arduenne silve. And turned over near the Ardennes Forest. Les deux bastards par l´aisne decollé The eldest sister´s two airborne bastards Et regnera Aenobarb, nez de milve And hawk-nosed Aenobarb will rule.
 Nostradamus clearly relates England´s loss of empire to the US and Russia becoming the super-powers in 1945. Very briefly, the "great Empire" is not France or Germany, but Great Britain(see III.57, X.100, and VIII.97). VIII.97 speaks of the Treaty of Verdun, ruin for a people under the rule of time(England´s Capricorn Sun), and rule for a people of change and growth(US ruler Mercury in second house). The USA is the "eldest sister" of the French Republic(Henry C. Roberts on IV.96). The surprise German advance at the Battle of the Bulge forced Allied generals to plan their reaction at Verdun, France, 19Dec1944, 11AM, GMD. The event chart 8*Aquarius Asc.= English Mars, 25Dec1066, Noon, Westminster, and 5*Sagittarius MC= General Patton´s ruling Mercury. As Montgomery threw in the towel, Patton rescued the 101st Airborne("Bastards of Bastogne") who with the 82nd Airborne were blocking the Germans. This is all accurately portrayed in the film classic "Patton". "Decollé"= "decolado"(having taken off or AIRBORNE) in Portuguese, the modern language closest to Nostradamus´s Provençal dialect. We publicly challenge CSICOP magicians and clowns to explain away the phrase "two airborne bastards" specifically related to the Ardennes Forest. V.59 connects Aenobarb to the Spanish Civil War, so he must be Stalin and not De Gaulle. 17*Scorpio-rising(hawk-nosed) Stalin was the true victor of Hitler´s Ardennes gamble. On 6Jan1945, Churchill asked him for help, and on 12Jan1945, 1:30AM(Sun 291*= Elizabeth´s Ascendant!), the Red Army attacked in Poland(H.G. Dahms, "Geschichte des Zweiten Weltkriegs", vol. II, p. 398). Although FDR has been accused of selling out at Yalta, Stalin had achieved his deliberate intent of occupying Eastern Europe by Feb.1945. Goebbels coined the phrase "Iron Curtain", and US Secretary of State Stettinius noted that if the US and Britain had never signed the Yalta Agreement, the same realities which led to the Cold War would have already existed on the ground. Elizabeth is a fine queen, but no empire builder. In 1945 when she learned to drive, her progressed Asc.= natal Mars/Jupiter at 21*Aquarius, showing ambulance service(Jupiter rules 11th and 12th), major military decisions abroad, and the sterile British victory which she celebrated incognito.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Adb web user
Ex Member




re: Queen of England Elizabeth II
« Reply #9 - on: 26.06.2002 at 13:30 [UT+1] »
 
reply by Astrodatabank Web User Serenella Venier
 
This site should correct the Moon and Mercury position for it's charts, but it's comon error. The Moon is not there, in short. Chiron is not the largest centaur and should be replaced by larger objects: http://www.mountainastrologer.com/discus/messages/699/807.html?1025074429
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Adb web user
Ex Member




re: Queen of England Elizabeth II
« Reply #10 - on: 18.11.2004 at 12:30 [UT] »
 
reply by Astrodatabank Web User D.K.DALE  WARD
 
ONE SMALL COMMENT ... A SLIGHT CORRECTION, IF YOU WILL. I THOUGHT THAT ONLY 75% OF HER MAJESTY'S CHILDREN HAD BEEN IN THE SEX SCANDAL SHEETS. I COULD BE MISTAKEN, BUT I THINK THAT EDWARD IS THE ONLY ONE THAT, SAVE FOR THE TELEVISION PRODUCTION SCANDAL, HAS BEEN ABLE TO KEEP HIS HEAD ABOVE WATER. I COULDN'T AGREE MORE THAT HER MAJESTY MUST BE MORE THAN A LITTLE DISAPPOINTED IN THE BEHAVIOR OF HER CHILDREN. I AM CERTAIN SHE LOVES THEM - DON'T ALL MOTHERS, BUT WITH THE LATEST BIT OF NEWS ON THE MAN WHO WILL BE KING REMARKING PEOPLE SHOULD NOT ATTEMPT TO SEEK OUT A POSITION HIGHER THAN THEY WERE BORN INTO CERTAINLY SMACKS OF SNOBISM. LET'S HOPE THAT HER MAJESTY LIVES LONG, AS CHARLES SEEMS TO INSIST ON OPENING HIS MOUTH TO CHANGE FEET, AND IT IS RATHER BOTHERSOME TO THINK WHAT FURTHER DAMAGE HE COULD DO TO THE ROYAL FAMILY WITH A CROWN ON HIS HEAD. REGARDS,
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Adb web user
Ex Member




re: Queen of England Elizabeth II
« Reply #11 - on: 23.02.2005 at 12:30 [UT] »
 
reply by Astrodatabank Web User dawn woodhouse
 
Well I am posting a link. One to an article appearing today and another to a post of mine on a vedic website feb 11th around when the royal wedding was initially announced:
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-britain-royal-wedding,0,3217 535,print.story?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines
Tabloids: Charles' wedding in 'shambles' February 23, 2005, 1:50 PM EST
LONDON -- Buckingham Palace says Queen Elizabeth II won't be attending her son's wedding to keep the occasion "low key." Fat chance.
"Queen's anger at wedding shambles," said London's Evening Standard newspaper on Wednesday, while The Sun headed its coverage "Royal bombshell."
Below is my post on feb 11 2005
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SAMVA/message/8329 From: "Dawn" Date: Fri Feb 11, 2005 1:02 am Subject: Re: Prince Charles and Camilla to marry in a stellium
Charles and camilla have picked a real doozey of a day to marry..
Certainly the dual malefic aspects of Rahu and Saturn to the royal planets suggest destruction to royalty. The marriage timing suggests it will have significant impact.
If they wanted a quiet marriage that wont cause much of a stir, they really picked the wrong time. One way or another it will impact.
And its worth mentioning that the effect of the eclipse will be to create unexpected outcomes, sometimes quite badly, the only saving grace is at least its not on a Saturday. Its taking place on a Friday, unfortunately Venus is of course afflicted by Rahu and Saturn as you noticed, so its not much of a reprieve.
Mars and Venus are mutually angular in transit. Natal mars to transit Venus, and transit Mars makes a partial aspect and is angular to natal Venus, suggesting sexuality is a key motivation. Mercury trinas positons, transit to charles natal chart is positive for communication, but the Mercury Saturn opposition and debiliated mercury isnt going to be helpful. whether thats more about how its recieved publically -- well thats likely ...
dawn
and this follow up
8333 From: Dawn <astrodawnau@yahoo.com.au> Date: Fri Feb 11, 2005 7:02am Subject: Re: Prince Charles and Camilla to marry in a stellium
 Yes re reading what I said, I was not that clear about Mars and venus, well I guess thats what happens when you post at 1.00am..  
I was looking at the aspects from the transiting Venus and Mars on the wedding day, to Princes Charles natal Venus and Mars.  
Perhaps its worth looking at the Queens chart to check her longevity at this point. Because I am not sure how well recieved Camilla will be if Charles has to take the job soon. The public reaction may only be to ignore it, like it, or to remove the royalty.  
The malefic aspects to the royal planets on this significant day for Charles, suggest at least some difficulties for royalty.
I am actually just looked at the Chaitra Shukla for Londons location which is on 8th April this year.
Saturn is the 4th lord, ie the masses and its squaring the royal planets in the 6th house.
The 3rd rule, the press, is in the 12th in Parivatana yoga with Mercury in the 6th.
The aspect from Jupiter to that cluster of Pisces planets suggests some help from the press, but the exchange is unsettling. It could mean they get stabbed in the back. Mercury is certainly malefic for Libra the Chaitra Shukla ascendant. Perhaps it means they intend to use the press to paint it in a favourable light.
dawn
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Adb web user
Ex Member




re: Queen of England Elizabeth II
« Reply #12 - on: 04.04.2005 at 13:30 [UT+1] »
 
reply by Astrodatabank Web User Dawn Woodhouse
 
Well as anticipated unexpected outcomes are arising for the Charles Camilla wedding. Theres all sorts of reactions to whether Camilla will be queen.
Then suddenly the Popes funeral looks like it might be on friday. Certainly the vatican chart is hit by the eclipse too.
 "And its worth mentioning that the effect of the eclipse will be to create unexpected outcomes, sometimes quite badly, the only saving grace is at least its not on a Saturday. Its taking place on a Friday, unfortunately Venus is of course afflicted by Rahu and Saturn as you noticed, so its not much of a reprieve." dawn woodhouse 2/23/2005
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Adb web user
Ex Member




re: Queen of England Elizabeth II
« Reply #13 - on: 04.04.2005 at 13:30 [UT+1] »
 
reply by Astrodatabank Web User dawn woodhouse
 
The wedding has been postponed until Saturday. Prince Charles will attend the Popes funeral friday.  
Saturday is the worst choice for weddings, as Saturn rules and has rulership over events taking place that day as a result. Hence it will be very troublesome for the marriage. Better he had waited till Sunday.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Adb web user
Ex Member




re: Queen of England Elizabeth II
« Reply #14 - on: 14.05.2005 at 13:30 [UT+1] »
 
reply by Astrodatabank Web User Comr. Onyemuwa A Isaac
 
My name is Comr. Onyemuwa Isaac, from Umuagu, Aguebi, Umuahia, Abia State, in Nigeria. After reading the astrology and scanning through the chart, i am pleased to drop this little comment.
For the beginning of life is not easy and the goings in life time is the hardest thing to do, I just want to speak on the positive side of Queen Elizabeth, her life is a chanllage to any human for despite her Royal family, she is humble, obedient and respectful to all she comes across.
I also want to comment on the children, although it is not easy to train children in such royal life but I would like Comr. Queen of England (I called her comrade for she is a human right activist as I am) to continue to train them, mostly in the ways of the Lord Jesus Christ, for the must surely stand after her.
thanks,
Comr. Onyemuwa Isaac (Student Accountancy, in Federal Polytechnic Oko Nigeria).
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Adb web user
Ex Member




re: Queen of England Elizabeth II
« Reply #15 - on: 18.06.2005 at 13:30 [UT+1] »
 
reply by Astrodatabank Web User Jonathan Dunn
 
Re: 6/26/2002 comment of Serenella Venier While Chiron is not the largest centaur core-wise, it has an extensive captured coma quasi-astmosphere. If this were measured, the "size" of Chiron would muck larger than the other Centaurs. Chiron is the only centaur which exhibits cometary activity, and is still listed as the largest comet.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Adb web user
Ex Member




re: Queen of England Elizabeth II
« Reply #16 - on: 06.11.2005 at 12:30 [UT] »
 
reply by Astrodatabank Web User
 
i think she is very nice and respectful
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Adb web user
Ex Member




re: Queen of England Elizabeth II
« Reply #17 - on: 17.01.2006 at 12:30 [UT] »
 
reply by Astrodatabank Web User Chelsea
 
Qween Elizabeth was know to have two birthdays . One was her actual birth date . What was the other one for?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Adb web user
Ex Member




re: Queen of England Elizabeth II
« Reply #18 - on: 09.03.2006 at 12:30 [UT] »
 
reply by Astrodatabank Web User SeeYa
 
The other date was used to detract those wise to the art of astrology from knowing her weaknesses. It was common practice among monarchy not to provide specifics surrounding their birth for fear of foresight of weakness by detractors and opponents.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Adb web user
Ex Member




re: Queen of England Elizabeth II
« Reply #19 - on: 12.04.2006 at 13:30 [UT+1] »
 
reply by Astrodatabank Web User ehti
 
i have seen her 20 years ago in my dreams while in those days i dont know her but when i saw her picture she was the same.is it amazing? huh?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Current Planets
22-Jul-2014, 21:33 UT/GMT
Sun29Cancer59'40"
Moon15Gemini0' 8"
Mercury12Cancer51'39"
Venus5Cancer12' 8"
Mars28Libra20'56"
Jupiter1Leo26' 6"
Saturn16Scorpio38'50"
Uranus16Aries30'29"r
Neptune7Pisces7'44"r
Pluto11Capricorn50' 9"r
TrueNode23Libra29'49"r
Chiron17Pisces17'43"r
Explanations of the symbols
Chart of the moment

Copyright © 2014 Astrodienst AG  - report a problem